· 10/19/1978
O'BRIEN v. Sperry Univac
Citations
- 458 F. Supp. 1179
- 1 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1940
- 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14838
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that suit seeking to have portion of “plan declared void because the summary plan description appears to alter the terms of the original plan . . . is not a claim under the ‘terms of the plan’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Charles R. Richey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.