O'Brien v. Sky Chefs, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the ALJ only needs to include limitations supported by the record in his hypothetical question to the VE
• noting that the ALJ only needs to include limitations supported by the record in his hypothetical question to the VE
• stating that the VE’s testimony may only be considered if the question accurately reflected the claimant’s physical and mental impairments
• stating that a “vocational expert’s testimony concerning a claimant’s ability to perform alternative employment may only be considered for purposes of determining disability if the question accurately portrays the claimant’s individual physical and mental impairments”
• stating that a “vocational expert’s testimony concerning a claimant’s ability to perform alternative employment may only be considered for purposes of determining disability if the question accurately portrays the claimant’s individual physical and mental impairments”
• finding ALJ’s failure to include two medically undisputed impairments in questions to VE rendered questions defective and answer was not considered substantial evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).