O'Brien v. O'Brien
Citations
- 124 Cal. 422
Syllabus
<p>Bill of Exceptions—Defective Notice of Settlement—Waiver.—Objection to a defective notice of settlement of a. bill of exceptions, which failed to specify that the proposed amendments would he presented to the judge with the bill, is waived, if the bill and amendments were in fact presented to the judge in the presence of both parties at the time specified, and the hearing was postponed from time to time by consent, and without objection urged prior to the final hearing.</p> <p>Amendment of Judgment—Clerical Misprision—Judicial Errors.— Clerical misprisions in a judgment may be corrected at any time by an order of the court, so as to make it conform to the actual decision of the court; but judicial errors in rendering the judgment cannot he corrected by amendment of the judgment. An omission in the findings may be corrected prior to the entry of judgment by additional findings; but after the entry of judgment, a judicial error can only be remedied by motion for new trial or on appeal.</p> <p>Id.—Judgment in Divorce Suit—Failure to Award Alimony—Loss of Jurisdiction to Amend.—Where the question of alimony was in issue in a divorce suit, and no finding was made thereupon, and no alimony was awarded in the order of judgment, or in the entry thereof, the error is judicial, and after the entry of judgment the court loses jurisdiction to amend it so as to reserve the question of alimony or to award alimony upon motion.</p> <p>Id.—Appearance upon Motion.—The court having lost jurisdiction of the subject matter, as well as of the parties, the appearance of the defendant in the subsequent matter of a motion for permanent alimony did not have the effect to reopen the judgment, or authorize its amendment by motion.</p> <p>Id.—Prior Reservation of Question of Alimony—Subsequent -Findings and Decree without Reservation—Signature of Judge.—The fact that at the time of originally announcing decision in the divorce ease the question of alimony was reserved cannot authorize an ame
Judges: Chipman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bowman v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1947-03-21· cited 130×
- Eckstrom v. Citizens National Trust & Savings Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1960-08-05· cited 49×
- Baxter v. BaxterCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1935-01-17· cited 43×
- Lankton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1936-03-25· cited 42×
- Monroe v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1946-06-25· cited 30×
- Cameron v. CameronSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1913-03-31· cited 23×
- Morgan v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1949-01-17· cited 21×
- Darby v. DarbyTennessee Supreme Court· 1925-12-06· cited 18×
- Felton Chemical Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1939-07-10· cited 17×
- Silva v. Second Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court· 1937-04-05· cited 17×
- Barry v. BarryCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1954-03-24· cited 15×
- Hercules Glue Co. v. LittooyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1941-05-27· cited 13×
- Marvin & Jones, Inc. v. TorresSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1913-02-04· cited 7×
- Barkelew v. BarkelewCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1946-02-15· cited 4×
- Warden v. WardenNYC Family Court· 1972-02-14· cited 4×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Howell v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court· 1894-09-10· cited 83×
- In re the Estate of CookCalifornia Supreme Court· 1888-10-23· cited 63×
- Smith v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court· 1890-01-15· cited 34×
- First National Bank v. DusyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1895-11-14· cited 26×
- Byrne v. HoagCalifornia Supreme Court· 1897-01-29· cited 19×
- Condee v. BartonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1882-11-06· cited 16×
- Hicks v. MastenCalifornia Supreme Court· 1894-03-20· cited 11×
- Hayes v. WetherbeeCalifornia Supreme Court· 1882-04-05· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.