O'Brien v. Hurley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding documents gathered by Sumner Simpson, a former president of Raybestos Manhattan (now Raymark)
• holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding documents gathered by Sumner Simpson, a former president of Raybestos Manhattan (now Raymark)
• holding that invoice evidence, standing alone, was not sufficient to establish that a particular product was a substantial con- tributing factor where invoices showed only the purchase of asbestos- containing product, but not when or where the product was used
• finding insufficient exposure to asbestos dust from a pipe covering product on ten to fifteen occasions of between one and eight hours of duration
• “in Maryland, state of the art can be considered in a strict liability tort case where the claimed defect is a failure to warn”
• exposure to asbestos-containing pipe covering on ten to fifteen occasions of between one and eight hours duration insufficient to satisfy frequency-regularity-proximity test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).