O'Brien v. Cleveland (In Re O'Brien)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• financing scheme involving homeowner’s conveyance of home to defendant, with buy-back option, constituted unconscionable commercial practice under CFA
• “the terms—unconscionable commercial practice, deception, fraud and false promise — are used disjunctively so it is conceivable that a commercial practice might not be fraudulent or deceptive but would, nevertheless, be unconscionable”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).