Obriecht v. Raemisch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that original grantor intended deed language concerning the use of a well and aqueduct as an exception of “an appurtenance to” the property he retained for his use and the use of his successors
• holding that right to use spring includes not only “the right to take water therefrom, but to do whatever was reasonably necessary to make that right available for the purpose for which it was intended”
• “The spring was in existence, and the exception not only secured to Sykes the right to take water therefrom, but to do whatever was reasonably necessary to make that right available for the purpose for which it was intended.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).