Skip to main content
· 6/30/2004

Oblix, Inc. v. Felicia Ferguson Winiecki

Citations

  • 374 F.3d 488
  • 58 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1031
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 13470
  • 85 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,690
  • 93 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1833
  • 2004 WL 1462672

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that unconscionability argument has been “rejected in this circuit as often as it has been raised”
  • noting that “9 U.S.C. § 16(a)(1) allows an interlocutory appeal from a decision denying a party the benefit of arbitration”
  • stating a worker’s salary is consideration for an arbitration clause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Wood, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.