· 6/30/2004
Oblix, Inc. v. Felicia Ferguson Winiecki
Citations
- 374 F.3d 488
- 58 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1031
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 13470
- 85 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,690
- 93 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1833
- 2004 WL 1462672
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that unconscionability argument has been “rejected in this circuit as often as it has been raised”
- noting that “9 U.S.C. § 16(a)(1) allows an interlocutory appeal from a decision denying a party the benefit of arbitration”
- stating a worker’s salary is consideration for an arbitration clause
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Easterbrook, Wood, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.