Skip to main content
· 3/11/1878

Oberle v. Schmidt

Citations

  • 86 Pa. 221
  • 1878 Pa. LEXIS 45

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a corrections officer was in a “highly sensitive” position
  • holding that a corrections officer was in a ‘highly sensitive’ position
  • prison guards’ possession of marijuana was just cause for dismissal because it cast doubt on ability to perform in sensitive position
  • prison guard possessing marijuana at a state correctional institution removed because the offense violated the parameters of his sensitive position and cast doubt on his competency and ability to execute duties
  • prison guard possessing marijuana at a state correctional institution removed because the offense violated the parameters of his sensitive position and cast doubt on his competency and ability to execute duties
  • Dismissal of prison guard for possession of marijuana proper since such conduct violates the parameters of the sensitive position held and casts doubt upon competency and ability to execute duties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gordon, Mercur, New, Paxson, Sharswood, Trunkey, Woodward

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.