Oberlander's Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• an opinion which rests on no more than possibilities is not entitled to probative value
• expert opinion as to causal relationship, “although clothed in the garb of probability, [was in reality] no more than [a] possibility]”
• not addressing whether an intervening cause could have disrupted showing of simple causation; distinguishing updated language of § 26A in comparison to that in effect during Tetrault’s Case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).