Oberist Lee Saunders v. George C. Duke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that courts may consider “documents attached to a complaint or incorporated in the complaint by reference . . . in ruling on a motion to dismiss”
• holding that the court could not accept as true the statements contained in a police report attached to a plaintiff’s complaint because the plaintiff expressly alleged that the report was false
• recognizing that Twombly and Iqbal apply to pro se complaints
• recognizing that Twombly and Iqbal apply to pro se complaints
• recognizing that Twombly and Iqbal apply to pro se complaints
• recognizing that Twombly and Iqbal apply to pro se complaints

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).