· 12/15/1873
Oats v. Walls
Citations
- 28 Ark. 244
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that without BLM determination, plaintiff could not establish a valid property interest in his unpatented mining claim
- explaining that plaintiffs failure to establish a valid property interest would warrant dismissal for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted
- finding without BLM determination, plaintiff could not establish a valid property interest in the surface of his unpatented mining claim
- finding without BLM determination, plaintiff could not establish a valid property interest in his unpatented mining claim
- “An unpatented mining claim is an interest in only the minerals in the land and not in the land’s surface; the government retains fee title to the land.”
- “This Court does not have jurisdiction over claims solely for injunctive relief_”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Being, Farrelly, Gregg, Hon, Stephenson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.