Skip to main content
· 12/15/1873

Oats v. Walls

Citations

  • 28 Ark. 244

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that without BLM determination, plaintiff could not establish a valid property interest in his unpatented mining claim
  • explaining that plaintiffs failure to establish a valid property interest would warrant dismissal for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted
  • finding without BLM determination, plaintiff could not establish a valid property interest in the surface of his unpatented mining claim
  • finding without BLM determination, plaintiff could not establish a valid property interest in his unpatented mining claim
  • “An unpatented mining claim is an interest in only the minerals in the land and not in the land’s surface; the government retains fee title to the land.”
  • “This Court does not have jurisdiction over claims solely for injunctive relief_”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Being, Farrelly, Gregg, Hon, Stephenson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.