Oats v. Nissan Motor Corp. in U.S.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the non-moving party “failed to present evidence sufficient to create a genuine issue” when the offered evidence “was wholly eonclusory, and merely repeated allegations” contained in the non-moving party’s complaint
• analyzing affidavit submitted in opposition to summary judgment motion, finding it flawed under Rule 56(e), and affirming district court’s grant of summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).