Oates v. Union Pacific Railway Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that ambiguity in a Letter of Understanding setting forth commission structure created “a legitimate dispute as to whether the plaintiff owed wages to the employees”
• stating the general rule that “a person employed on a commission basis to solicit sales orders is entitled to his commission when the order is accepted by his employer” (quoting Galloway v. Chicago-Soft, Ltd., 142 N.H. 752, 713 A.2d 982, 984 (1998))
• specifying three and one-half percent “commission” for modular home sales

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).