Skip to main content

Oates v. State

Citations

  • 619 So. 2d 23
  • 1993 WL 174883

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding trial judge’s comment that the defendant was “being an obstinate jerk” was insufficient to support a motion to disqualify the judge when the defendant had continuously interrupted the proceedings to the extent that he had to be removed from the courtroom
  • finding the trial judge's comment that the defendant \was just being an obstinate jerk\ was not a ground for recusal because the defendant's behavior prompted the remark
  • finding the trial judge’s comment that the defendant “was just being an obstinate jerk” was not a ground for recusal because the defendant’s behavior prompted the remark
  • contempt judgment must include recital of facts constituting contempt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Klein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.