Oakland-Alameda County Builders' Exchange v. F. P. Lathrop Construction Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• invalidating a prohibition on unsealing competitor bids after bidding had culminated on the grounds that it “restrain[ed] open price competition and unlawfully tamper[ed] with the pricing structure”
• “This argument raises 4 the difficult question whether this case should be treated as a case of tying the sale of one product to 5 the sale of another product or merely as the sale of a single product.”
• “This argument raises the difficult question whether this case should 22 be treated as a case of tying the sale of one product to the sale of another product or merely as the 23 sale of a single product.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).