O-M Bread, Inc. And Roush Products Company, Inc. v. United States Olympic Committee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that-word mark. “Olympic” was not sufficiently similar to “Olympic Kids” for purposes of satisfying Morehouse
• observing that “[e]quitable principles are available when justice requires”
• OLYMPIC KIDS creates a different commercial impression than OLYMPIC, notwithstanding the disclaimer of KIDS and its lack of strong trademark significance
• OLYMPIC KIDS creates a different commercial impression than OLYMPIC, notwithstanding the disclaimer of KIDS and its lack of strong trademark significance
• “OLYMPIC and OLYMPIC KIDS are neither the same mark nor are they legal equivalents.”
• OLYMPIC and OLYMPIC KIDS are neither the same nor legally equivalent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).