O & J Loading Service, LLC v. Mississippi Employment Security Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to impose on insurer \defense costs [that arose] outside of its policy period\ and for which the insured never contracted
• allocating defense costs to the insured for periods when it was uninsured by choice, or had lost or destroyed the policies
• adopting pro rata allocation in an asbestos case with a “continuous trigger situation”
• “Neither the insurers nor the insured could reasonably have expected that the insurers would be liable for losses occurring in periods outside of their respective policy coverage periods”
• “Neither the insurers nor the insured could reasonably have expected that the insurers would be liable for losses occurring in periods outside of their respective policy coverage periods.”
• “Neither the insurers nor the insured could reasonably have expected that the insurers would be liable for losses occurring in periods outside of their respective policy coverage periods.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).