O. J. Gude Co. v. Newark Sign Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “while Movants cite to their jury demand as a reason to withdraw the reference now, the Court may withdraw the reference if and when a trial is necessary”
• declining to withdraw reference where the bankruptcy court “ha[d] already spent three years working on th[e] adversary proceeding and [was] intimately familiar with its details”
• \[CJautionary dicta and past practice do not overcome the logic of the Supreme Court's holding in Stem.\
• “[E]xperience strongly suggests that having the benefit of the report and recommendation will save the district court and the parties an immense amount of time.”
• “[E]xperience strongly suggests that having the benefit of the report and recommendation will save the district court and the parties an immense amount of time.”
• when no proof of claim has been filed, at the least, bankruptcy court has the authority to issue a report and recommendation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).