Skip to main content
· 5/7/1997

Nyman v. Chairman, Federal Deposit Insurance

Citations

  • 967 F. Supp. 1562
  • 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8628
  • 1997 WL 336574

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • contrasting that plaintiffs wages with the wages paid to several of her individual male peer co-workers
  • contrasting that plaintiff’s wages with the wages paid to several of her individual male peer co-workers
  • contrasting that plaintiffs position with several of her male co-workers’ with respect to the number of subordinates each supervised, the extent of responsibilities for each, the specific skill level for each, and the working conditions for each
  • contrasting that plaintiff’s position with several of her male co-workers’ with respect to the number of subordinates each supervised, the extent of responsibilities for each, the specific skill level for each, and the working conditions for each
  • “Motions for a new trial ‘must clearly establish either a manifest error of law or fact or must present newly discovered evidence.’ ” (quoting FDIC v. Meyer, 781 F.2d 1260, 1268 (7th Cir. 1986))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Urbina

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.