Nylok Corporation v. Fastener World Incorporation, Nasalok Coating Corporation, Unilock Industrial Co., and Nypatch Industrial Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that dismissal might be appropriate where “a plaintiff made no attempt to begin the process of foreign service within 120 days.”
• explaining that “district courts need to be able to control their dockets”
• stating that “the amount of time allowed for foreign service is not unlimited” and suggesting that dismissal may be appropriate “[i]f, for example, a plaintiff made no attempt to begin the process of foreign service within 120 days”
• stating that “the amount of time allowed for foreign service is not unlimited” and suggesting that dismissal may be appropriate “[i]f, for example, a plaintiff made no attempt to begin the process of foreign service within 120 days”
• discussing an older version of the rule, which allowed 120 days for service
• stating “the amount of time allowed for foreign service is not unlimited”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).