Michigan Court of Appeals· 11/4/1986
Nygard v. Nygard
Citations
- 401 N.W.2d 323
- 156 Mich. App. 94
- 1986 Mich. App. LEXIS 3046
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding elements of equitable estoppel existed permitting court to compel nonbiological father to pay child support
- stating that promissory estoppel may apply if statute of frauds prevents enforcement of child support contract
- applying promissory estoppel to conclude that a husband who had agreed to raise an unborn child as his own could be held responsible for child support
- having persuaded mother during pregnancy to forgo putting child up for adoption when born and instead to marry him and let him act as father, husband was estopped from disclaiming paternity
- having persuaded mother during pregnancy to forgo putting child up for adoption when born and instead to marry him and let him act as father, husband was estopped from disclaiming paternity
- if statute of frauds prevents enforcement of child support contract, defendant may be held liable under the doctrine of promissory estoppel
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burns, Gillis, Kelly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Weinand v. WeinandNebraska Supreme Court· 2000-08-04· cited 102×
- Van v. ZahorikMichigan Supreme Court· 1999-07-07· cited 100×
- Atkinson v. AtkinsonMichigan Court of Appeals· 1987-06-08· cited 87×
- Dumas v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals· 1988-05-17· cited 69×
- Lakeside Oakland Development, LC v. H & J Beef Co.Michigan Court of Appeals· 2002-05-03· cited 41×
- LaMothe v. Auto Club InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals· 1995-12-15· cited 31×
- PARKHURST HOMES, INC v. McLAUGHLINMichigan Court of Appeals· 1991-02-05· cited 27×
- Pietros v. PietrosSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1994-03-14· cited 25×
- Van v. ZahorikMichigan Court of Appeals· 1998-03-10· cited 23×
- S.R.D. v. T.L.B.Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2005-09-02· cited 21×
- Mt. Carmel Mercy Hospital v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals· 1992-07-06· cited 18×
- A.R. v. C.R.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1992-01-09· cited 18×
- Hawkins v. MurphyMichigan Court of Appeals· 1997-07-01· cited 16×
- Wright v. NewmanSupreme Court of Georgia· 1996-03-04· cited 13×
- Whitlock v. Iowa District Court for Fayette CountySupreme Court of Iowa· 1993-03-24· cited 13×
- ECCO, Ltd. v. Balimoy Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals· 1989-08-22· cited 13×
- Guise v. RobinsonMichigan Court of Appeals· 1996-11-22· cited 9×
- Hazime v. Martin Oil of Indiana, Inc.E.D. Michigan· 1992-06-16· cited 6×
- Kb v. DbMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1994-09-09· cited 6×
- K.B. v. D.B.Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1994-09-09· cited 5×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Schipani v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals· 1981-01-06· cited 135×
- Opdyke Investment v. NORRIS GRAIN COMPANYMichigan Supreme Court· 1982-05-18· cited 104×
- McMath v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals· 1977-08-23· cited 51×
- Pursell v. Wolverine-Pentronix, IncMichigan Court of Appeals· 1973-01-17· cited 39×
- Johnson v. JohnsonMichigan Court of Appeals· 1979-11-05· cited 22×
- Magarell v. MagarellMichigan Supreme Court· 1950-04-03· cited 14×
- Oral Roberts Evangelistic Ass'n v. Timko EstateMichigan Court of Appeals· 1974-03-04· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.