Nye v. Fire Group Partnership

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• summary judgment reversed because there was evidence that both parties used disputed property, constituting genuine issue of material fact with regard to exclusivity
• possession was notorious where adverse holders planted grass, mowed and maintained property, erected snow fence in winter, and left fenceposts permanently in place

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).