N.Y.C. Apparel F.Z.E. v. United States Customs & Border Protection Bureau

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “§ 4 of the OGA cannot be applied retroactively to the circumstances of this case”
• “Here, the statutory provision in question is silent with respect to the issue of retroactivity.”
• pursuant to statutory interpretation and because there is a presumption against retroactivity, holding that the amendments are not retroactive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).