Nevada Supreme Court· 1/19/1948
Nyberg v. Kirby
Citations
- 188 P.2d 1006
- 65 Nev. 42
- 1948 Nev. LEXIS 42
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The consideration may be any benefit conferred or any detriment suffered, . . . and the law will not enter into an inquiry into its adequacy.”
- Excessive Speed on Bad Roads
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Horsey, Badt, Eather
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Pink v. BuschNevada Supreme Court· 1984-12-07· cited 46×
- Lightenburger v. GordonNevada Supreme Court· 1965-11-10· cited 23×
- Dutt v. KrempNevada Supreme Court· 1995-04-27· cited 21×
- Klatka v. BarkerSupreme Court of Colorado· 1951-12-24· cited 18×
- Shydler v. ShydlerNevada Supreme Court· 1998-02-26· cited 18×
- Sullivan v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama· 1955-11-03· cited 18×
- Woosley v. State Farm InsuranceNevada Supreme Court· 2001-03-06· cited 18×
- Johnson v. FosterMississippi Supreme Court· 1967-10-02· cited 14×
- Dutt v. KrempNevada Supreme Court· 1992-12-31· cited 10×
- Kuser v. BarengoNevada Supreme Court· 1953-03-13· cited 10×
- Cook v. FariaNevada Supreme Court· 1957-11-26· cited 4×
- Nicora v. DemosthenesNevada Supreme Court· 1952-04-14· cited 1×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court· 1913-04-07· cited 546×
- San Juan Light & Transit Co. v. RequenaSupreme Court· 1912-03-18· cited 176×
- Ales v. RyanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1936-12-31· cited 96×
- Druzanich v. CrileyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1942-02-06· cited 72×
- Haney v. TakakuraCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1934-11-05· cited 44×
- Walker v. AdamsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1937-07-24· cited 39×
- Van Auker v. Steckley's Hybrid Seed Corn Co.Nebraska Supreme Court· 1943-03-05· cited 37×
- Fiske v. WilkieCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1945-01-02· cited 34×
- Elliott v. BehnerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1937-12-11· cited 32×
- Duclos v. TashjianCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1939-04-27· cited 23×
- Nicholson v. TarpeyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1886-09-03· cited 20×
- Carey v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1941-04-28· cited 18×
- Riley v. Berkeley Motors Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1934-10-02· cited 17×
- Lerma v. FloresCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1936-08-19· cited 16×
- Whittemore v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp.California Court of Appeal· 1942-04-30· cited 14×
- Bummer v. Liberty Laundry Co.California Court of Appeal· 1941-12-22· cited 9×
- Boyson v. PorterCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1935-12-02· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.