Nutrition & Fitness, Inc. v. Mark Nutritionals, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that several district courts have applied heightened pleading requirement but that no appellate court had opined on the propriety of doing so
• “Additionally, the Court notes that Defendant alleges that Plaintiffs [“Compare to”] label uses Body Solutions’ actual mark, trade dress and logo, which could further increase the potential for the statement to mislead.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).