Skip to main content
· 1/18/1965

Nussbaum v. Warehime

Citations

  • 379 U.S. 979

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that district court properly dismissed bank from action alleging violations of RICO and Sherman Act where loan transaction involving bank did not arise from same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences involving other defendants
  • claims involved different banks, different contracts, and different terms
  • “[D]ismissal of claims against misjoined parties is appropriate.”
  • “[D]ismissal of claims against misjoined parties is appropriate.”
  • “[D]ismissal of claims against misjoined parties is appropriate.”
  • “[D]ismissal of claims against misjoined parties is appropriate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.