Nussbaum v. City of Dallas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that although a city’s ordinance did not state which party had the burden of bringing administrative record to the reviewing court hearing, the procedural gaps would be filled in by 214.0012 because chapter 214 enabled the city to promulgate the ordinance
• reasoning that although a city’s ordinance did not state which party had the burden of bringing administrative record to the reviewing court hearing, the procedural gaps would be filled in by 214.0012 because chapter 214 enabled the city to promulgate the ordinance
• reasoning that although a city = s ordinance did not state which party had the burden of bringing administrative record to the reviewing court hearing, the procedural gaps would be filled in by 214.0012 because chapter 214 enabled the city to promulgate the ordinance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).