Nurriddin v. O'Keefe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• assuming without deciding that “receipt of an $800 award, rather than a larger amount,” represents an adverse action because it affected the plaintiffs compensation
• evaluating merits of non-promotion claim under an “accretion of duties” theory, where the plaintiff believed that he was qualified for a promotion in grade and salary within his own position
• “[N]either in his deposition nor in his brief does Nurriddin provide a date when this alleged statement was made.”
• summarizing facts underlying Nurriddin’s discrimination claims
• summarizing facts underlying Nurriddin's discrimination claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).