Nunsuch Ex Rel. Nunsuch v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting under Shaw’s test, the amount deducted will not necessarily equal the amount added
• “Loss of earnings is an item of 7 special damage and must be specially pleaded and proved.”
• in FTCA action for medical 13 malpractice, holding Arizona law requires expert witness testimony where the negligence 14 is not grossly apparent
• “Ordinarily, a plaintiff must present expert evidence of the accepted conduct of the profession and the defendant’s deviation from that standard unless the negligence is so grossly apparent that a layman would have no difficulty recognizing it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).