Skip to main content
· 5/4/2009

Nunn Law Office v. Rosenthal

Citations

  • 905 N.E.2d 513
  • 2009 Ind. App. LEXIS 846
  • 2009 WL 1213792

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that oral findings and conclusions may suffice for the purposes of T.R. 52(A)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bradford, Najam, Barnes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.