Nunley v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Conclusionary speculations in motion for post-conviction relief are not substantive evidence that trial counsel was ineffective.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• John Marshall v. State of Missouri
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2019-02-13· cited 20×
• Cole v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2007-05-31· cited 16×
• Shelton v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2014-05-20· cited 10×
• Stevens v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2011-11-23· cited 7×
• Murta v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2008-07-24· cited 4×
• TOTEN v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2009-10-30· cited 4×
• Blake Shelton v. State of Missouri
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2014-05-20
• Micah Wynes v. State of Missouri
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2021-07-06
• McCallum v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2005-05-17

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Hall
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1998-12-01· cited 142×
• State v. Kenley
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1997-08-20· cited 76×
• State v. Colbert
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1997-08-19· cited 23×
• Revelo v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1999-06-01· cited 20×
• State v. Ray
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1993-04-26· cited 13×
• State v. Vincent
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1990-03-14· cited 12×
• State v. Hope
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1997-09-24· cited 6×
• State v. Galicia
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1998-08-31· cited 3×