Skip to main content

Nunez v. State

Citations

  • 565 S.W.2d 536
  • 1978 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1138

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a penalty imposed within the range of punishment prescribed by the legislature will not be disturbed on appeal
  • holding that a penalty imposed within the range of punishment prescribed by the legislature will not be disturbed on appeal
  • explaining that “a penalty imposed within that range prescribed by the legislature will not be disturbed on appeal”
  • probation officer’s recommendation that defendant receive maximum sentence did not violate State’s agreement to make no punishment recommendation
  • “It is also the general rule that as long as a sentence is within the proper range of punishment it will not be disturbed on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roberts, Onion

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

102 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Nunez v. State

59 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.