S.D. New York· 10/23/2001
Nunez v. Goord
Citations
- 172 F. Supp. 2d 417
- 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17510
- 2001 WL 1297807
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the plaintiff's \stand alone and unsupported\ allegations that his grievances were either lost or destroyed did not defeat the defendants' entitlement to summary judgment
- holding PLRA’s exhaustion requirement does not apply to state-law claims
- “As Nunez’s cause of action alleging negligence does not invoke § 1983, or any other federal law, it is not subject to § 1997e(a)’s exhaustion requirement.”
- “As Nunez’s cause of action alleging negligence does not invoke § 1983, or any other federal law, it is not subject to § 1997e(a)’s exhaustion requirement.”
- “As [the plaintiff's] cause of action alleging negligence does not invoke § 1983, or any other federal law, it is not subject to § 1997e(a)’s exhaustion requirement.”
- “As [the plaintiff’s] cause of action alleging negligence does not invoke § 1983, or any other federal law, it is not subject to § 1997e(a)’s exhaustion requirement.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Marrero
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Randle v. AlexanderS.D. New York· 2013-05-30· cited 82×
- Boyd v. Corrections Corp. of AmericaSixth Circuit· 2004-09-08· cited 15×
- Dolberry v. LevineW.D. New York· 2008-07-28· cited 13×
- Barsoumian v. WilliamsW.D. New York· 2014-06-30· cited 11×
- Scott v. Kastner-SmithW.D. New York· 2018-03-30· cited 11×
- Green v. HerbertW.D. New York· 2010-02-01· cited 9×
- Labounty v. JohnsonW.D. New York· 2003-03-27· cited 7×
- Louis Boyd v. Corrections Corporation Of AmericaSixth Circuit· 2004-09-08
Cites
39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court· 1994-06-06· cited 28,443×
- Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court· 1992-02-25· cited 8,199×
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court· 1984-07-03· cited 8,014×
- Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court· 1981-06-15· cited 6,761×
- Helling v. McKinneySupreme Court· 1993-06-18· cited 4,262×
- Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1962-06-25· cited 2,369×
- Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.Supreme Court· 1982-06-21· cited 1,854×
- Huey B. Wright v. Harold Smith and Thomas A. Coughlin, IIISecond Circuit· 1994-04-06· cited 1,168×
- Colon v. CoughlinSecond Circuit· 1995-06-28· cited 772×
- Lloyd E. Boddie v. Officer B. Schnieder Officer D. Dewald Officer P. Robertson Sergeant K. Schmitt and Hearing Officer Mr. PicoSecond Circuit· 1997-02-04· cited 654×
- James Williams v. Harold J. Smith, Superintendent, and W. Morgan, C.O., Attica Correctional FacilitySecond Circuit· 1986-01-15· cited 571×
- Graham v. HendersonSecond Circuit· 1996-07-11· cited 435×
- Blyden v. MancusiSecond Circuit· 1999-08-03· cited 383×
- Square D Co. v. Niagara Frontier Tariff Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-05-27· cited 339×
- Francisco Franco v. Walter Kelly, Lt. Moscicki and Officer HigleySecond Circuit· 1988-07-25· cited 299×
- Flaherty v. CoughlinSecond Circuit· 1983-07-21· cited 255×
- Anthony Romano v. Kenneth Howarth, Michael Juron and Matthew KarkosSecond Circuit· 1993-07-02· cited 247×
- Joshua Liner v. Glenn Goord Walter Kelly Gilmore, Sgt. John Doe 1 John Doe 2Second Circuit· 1999-09-22· cited 231×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.