· 5/30/1812
Numan v. Kapp
Citations
- 5 Binn. 73
- 1812 Pa. LEXIS 36
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that, once jurisdiction to hear a contractual matter had attached through an application for injunctive relief, the court retained jurisdiction to resolve issues of damages, even though the contractual basis for an injunction had expired
- absent a term of personal satisfaction, unless a reasonable person would be dissatisfied with the work performance, the promisor cannot seek to discharge the contract if he was only personally dissatisfied
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brackenridge, During, Gave, Tilghman, Yeates
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.