Skip to main content
· 5/30/1812

Numan v. Kapp

Citations

  • 5 Binn. 73
  • 1812 Pa. LEXIS 36

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that, once jurisdiction to hear a contractual matter had attached through an application for injunctive relief, the court retained jurisdiction to resolve issues of damages, even though the contractual basis for an injunction had expired
  • absent a term of personal satisfaction, unless a reasonable person would be dissatisfied with the work performance, the promisor cannot seek to discharge the contract if he was only personally dissatisfied

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brackenridge, During, Gave, Tilghman, Yeates

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.