Nugent v. Yellow Cab Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that state contributions to Rutgers’s budget were comingled with the University’s tuition and other revenues into a discretionary pot of money over which Rutgers retained sole control
• noting that Rutgers’s claim to immunity was weakened by the fact that, “unlike other state agencies, [Rutgers is] not subject to civil service laws ... or administrative procedure requirements”
• noting that Rutgers retained title to the land on which it sits
• noting that Rutgers is not subject to New Jersey’s competitive bidding statutes
• finding Rutgers' status under New Jersey law to be too indeterminate to aid in the sovereign immunity inquiry
• finding Rutgers’ status under New Jersey law to be too indeterminate to aid in the sovereign immunity inquiry

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).