· 1/2/2019
Nuevos Destinos, LLC v. Peck
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a “license is ordinarily revocable at the will of the grantor.”
- suggesting allegations that police officers prevented plaintiff from entering the house where he was a tenant while the landlord removed his belongings, if true, might state a claim for a Fourth Amendment violation
- “[P]ro se litigants are not excused from the monetary sanctions available under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11.”
- “[A] plaintiff must allege and prove both a conspiracy and an actual deprivation of rights; mere proof of a conspiracy is insufficient to establish a section 1983 claim” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
- legal conclusions are not entitled to presumption of truth
- legal conclusions are not entitled to presumption of truth
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge Emmet G. Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.