Skip to main content
· 1/2/2019

Nuevos Destinos, LLC v. Peck

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a “license is ordinarily revocable at the will of the grantor.”
  • suggesting allegations that police officers prevented plaintiff from entering the house where he was a tenant while the landlord removed his belongings, if true, might state a claim for a Fourth Amendment violation
  • “[P]ro se litigants are not excused from the monetary sanctions available under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11.”
  • “[A] plaintiff must allege and prove both a conspiracy and an actual deprivation of rights; mere proof of a conspiracy is insufficient to establish a section 1983 claim” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
  • legal conclusions are not entitled to presumption of truth
  • legal conclusions are not entitled to presumption of truth

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Emmet G. Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.