Nuessen v. Sutherlands

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 32 Legislature's decision to revise existing law creates presumption that Legislature intended to change that law
• discussing Board's ability to impose a stay on payment of compensation awards when requested by the parties
• appellate court's review is unlimited when considering whether a court or administrative agency erroneously applies the law to undisputed facts
• \K.S.A. 44-512a(a) imposes a penalty when a timely demand has been made by the employee/claimant and the employer or insurance carrier fails to timely pay the benefits due.\ [Emphasis added.]
• pre-1993 version of 44-556 provided automatic stay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).