Nuclear Transport & Storage, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that claims for damages and injunctive relief against the United States and individual federal defendants in their official capacities were barred by the doctrine of sovereign immunity
• complaints asserting a Bivens cause of action are subject to the same heightened pleading requirements as claims under § 1983
• “Since the United States has not waived its sovereign-immunity and consented expressly to be sued in a Bivens-type action, such suits cannot be brought against the United States”
• “Since the United States has not waived its sovereign-immunity and consented expressly to be sued in a Bivens-type action, such suits cannot be brought against the United States”
• “Since the United States has not waived its sovereign-immunity and consented expressly to be sued in a Bivens-type action, such suits cannot be brought against the United States.”
• ‘Since the United States has not waived its sovereign-immunity and consented expressly to be sued in a Bivens-type action, such suits cannot be brought against the United States.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).