Nuclear Information & Resource Service v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no injury when the plaintiff “fail[ed] to explain why the new, on average more protective, regulation present[ed] a credible threat to its members’ health”
• “It is well settled that the zone of interests protected by NEPA is environmental.”
• setting forth constitutional standing requirements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).