Nuckols v. Gibson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that when the credibility of a witness “has already been substantially called into question in the same respects by other evidence, additional impeachment evidence will generally be immaterial”
• finding that when the credibility of a witness “has already been substantially called into question in the same respects by other evidence, additional impeachment evidence will generally be immaterial”
• finding a Brady violation where prosecution withheld evidence that was material to whether the defendant’s confession should have been suppressed
• finding that Brady obligations apply to pre-trial hearings
• finding a Brady violation where ―the prosecution withheld evidence that would have allowed defense counsel the means to test [the police officer‘s] credibility‖ where the admissibility of Mr. Nuckols‘s confession ―hinged upon proof‖ that he initiated the interview

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).