Skip to main content
· 9/7/2007

Nu-Vision, LLC v. CORPORATE CONVENIENCE

Citations

  • 965 So. 2d 232
  • 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 13950
  • 2007 WL 2509848

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[E]stablishing a ‘fair nexus’ between a claim in litigation and the property’s title requires a little more than simply pleading a theoretical nexus.”
  • “[R]equiring the proponent to show that he or she has a good faith basis to allege the facts supporting a claim, and that the facts alleged would at least state a viable claim, if true, is completely consistent with the policy concerns articulated in Chiusolo”
  • “However, establishing a ‘fair nexus’ between a claim in litigation and the property’s title requires a little more than simply pleading a theoretical nexus.”
  • a real estate contract embodied in one or more written documents must include all essential terms
  • “it would . . . be contrary to sound public policy to allow a lis pendens proponent to tie up real property belonging to another person when the proponent cannot even make a minimal showing that there is at least some basis for the underlying claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lawson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.