Skip to main content

Nshaka v. State

Citations

  • 92 So. 3d 843
  • 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4470
  • 2012 WL 932684

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding evidence inadmissible because it was too far removed and irrelevant to the crime charged
  • reversing where “no proof was presented that [defendant] had personal and exclusive dominion and control over the stolen property,” which had not been recently stolen

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hazouri, Polen, Taylor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.