Skip to main content
· 5/4/2010

N.S. Ex Rel. Stein v. District of Columbia

Citations

  • 709 F. Supp. 2d 57
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43542
  • 2010 WL 1767214

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that \failures to include required information in an IEP about the services to be provided a disabled student\ are more significant than failures to meet statutory deadlines and the like
  • awarding tuition reimbursement where IEP providing “incomplete picture” caused parents to enroll in private school
  • reversing an HOD and “[i]n so ruling, the Court [did] not disturb the Hearing Officer’s findings regarding the credibility of the witnesses who gave testimony at the due process hearing.”
  • “[B]ecause the Court strictly enforces LCvR 7(h), the Court shall hold Defendants to the position they adopted in their response to Plaintiffs’ Statement of Material Facts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Colleen Kollar-Kotelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.