N/S CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “we would feel most uneasy if this were an otherwise meritorious appeal, which cried out for reversal of the district court’s decisions”
• striking appellant's brief, 13 dismissing appeal, and stating: “In order to give fair 14 consideration to those who call upon us for justice, we must 15 insist that parties not clog the system by presenting us with a 16 slubby mass of words rather than a true brief.”
• “In order to give fair consideration to those who call upon us for justice, we must insist that parties not clog the system by presenting us with a slubby mass of words....”
• “In order to give fair 7 consideration to those who call upon us for justice, we must 8 insist that parties not clog the system by presenting us with a 9 slubby mass of words rather than a true brief. Hence we have 10 briefing rules.”
• dis issing appeal based on briefing violations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).