Noyes v. State of Delaware

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “there was no evidence to suggest that the actual amount of distributions made to the wife from the [S]ubchapter[-]S corporations bore any resemblance to the amount of the K-1 income reported by the wife for income tax purposes”
• noting that “there was no evidence to suggest that the actual amount of distributions made to the wife from the [S]ubchapter[-]S corporations bore any resemblance to the amount of the K-1 income reported by the wife for income tax purposes”
• discerning no error where trial judge did not credit husband's testimony in light of inconsistent evidence
• noting that “there was no evidence to suggest that the actual amount 4 of distributions made to the wife from the [S]ubchapter[-]S corporations bore any resemblance to the amount of the K-1 income reported by the wife for income tax purposes”
• no error in judge's treatment of husband's withdrawal of funds from individual retirement arrangement account as dissipation where husband acted without wife's permission and for purpose of maintaining high standard of living for himself to detriment of wife

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).