Skip to main content
· 7/1/1870

Noyes v. Staples

Citations

  • 61 Me. 422

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that attorney’s fees unrelated to ongoing litigation but instead claimed as an element of damages may be recovered as compensatory damages
  • holding that the Legislature’s use of the word “costs” did not include attorney’s fees as the definition of “litigation costs” elsewhere included both costs and attorney’s fees
  • holding that attorney's fees incurred in prosecuting or defending litigation are not compensatory damages and thus need not be superseded pending appeal under Civil Practice and Remedies Code section 52.006
  • concluding that “fees comprising the breach-of-contract damages are” actual damages
  • concluding, in context of chapter 52, that attorney’s fees incurred in prosecution or defense of claim are not compensatory damages
  • holding attorney’s fees are not “costs awarded in the judgment” as set forth in Rule 24

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cutting, Daneouth, Dickerson, Tapley, Walton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.