· 7/1/1870
Noyes v. Staples
Citations
- 61 Me. 422
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that attorney’s fees unrelated to ongoing litigation but instead claimed as an element of damages may be recovered as compensatory damages
- holding that the Legislature’s use of the word “costs” did not include attorney’s fees as the definition of “litigation costs” elsewhere included both costs and attorney’s fees
- holding that attorney's fees incurred in prosecuting or defending litigation are not compensatory damages and thus need not be superseded pending appeal under Civil Practice and Remedies Code section 52.006
- concluding that “fees comprising the breach-of-contract damages are” actual damages
- concluding, in context of chapter 52, that attorney’s fees incurred in prosecution or defense of claim are not compensatory damages
- holding attorney’s fees are not “costs awarded in the judgment” as set forth in Rule 24
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cutting, Daneouth, Dickerson, Tapley, Walton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.