Novotny v. Tripp County, SD

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “the enforcement of county weed ordinances” did not give rise to an equal 4 protection claim
• where plaintiff failed to show any underlying constitutional violation, his § 1985 conspiracy claims also failed
• no §1985 civil conspiracy violation where plaintiff cannot show any underlying constitutional violation
• applying Enquist to county’s enforcement of weed abatement ordinance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).