Skip to main content
· 1/18/2001

Novosteel SA v. United States

Citations

  • 128 F. Supp. 2d 720
  • 25 Ct. Int'l Trade 2
  • 25 C.I.T. 2
  • 23 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1008
  • 2001 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 2

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that administrative determination is supported by substantial evidence even if court could draw inconsistent conclusions from record
  • discussing the substantial evidence standard in the context of a challenge to the scope of antidumping and countervailing duty orders
  • “[T]wo products need not be an identical replacement for one another to have similar ultimate uses. . . . The ultimate use criterion does not require a complete overlap of uses to be supported by substantial evidence.”
  • construing the terms in question according to their common meaning
  • in the context of a conventional scope determination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.