Novinson v. Board of Education

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding there was no condition precedent where the relevant language, “Paragraph 16 of the agreement[,] provides merely for procedural purposes, . . . that the agreement may be executed in counterparts and subsequently attached together.”
• “[W]e reject defendants’ argument that a written contract does not become effective until delivery.” (citation omitted)
• Provision in agreement that permitted execution in counterparts was included in order to avoid the delay that delivery between the parties, who were separated by great distance, would necessitate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).