Novick v. AXA NETWORK, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]t is incumbent upon a party seeking immediate relief in the form of a Rule 54(b) judgment to show . . . that the equities favor entry of such a judgment.”
• “Guerilla projection without permission or permit. Subject to relocation, fine, or shutdown.”
• ‘[T] district court generally should not grant a Rule 54(b) certification ‘if the same or closely related issues remain to be litigated.’” (quoting Harriscom Svenska AB y. Harris Corp., 947 F.2d 627, 629 (2d Cir. 1991))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).